Rajiv Gandhi<\/a> and the SC order is legally flawed. “Granting remission to terrorist of foreign nation, who had been duly convicted in accordance with the law of land for gruesome offence of assassinating the former Prime Minister of the Country, is a matter which has international ramification and therefore falls squarely within the sovereign powers of the Union of India,\u201d the Centre, in its review petition, filed before the Supreme Court, revealed.<\/p>\nThe Centre said it didn’t get the chance to argue the case and the SC order is legally flawed, and thereby the Supreme Court should consider afresh and modify its order. Approaching the apex court the Centre contended that the order was passed without hearing it.<\/p>\n
On November 11, the Supreme Court ordered the release of six convicts including Nalini Sriharan and RP Ravichandran, who were serving life imprisonment in connection with the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi in the case.<\/p>\n
A bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice BR Gavai and also comprising Justice BV Nagarathna passed the order while taking into consideration the state of Tamil Nadu government’s order of releasing the six convicts prematurely, and also the good conduct of all the six convicts in the prison.<\/p>\n
The apex court had noted that they had been behind bars for a very long period. Seeking a review of the top court\u2019s order, the Centre said, \u201cThe order granting remission to the convicts who had assassinated the former Prime Minister of the country was passed without affording an adequate opportunity of hearing to Union of India.\u201d<\/p>\n
It said the Central government was not made a party in the case. \u201cNo application was ever filed by the petitioners formally impleading Union of India as party respondent. This procedural lapse on the part of the petitioners resulted in non-participation of Union of India in subsequent hearings of the case,\u201d it added.<\/p>\n
Furthermore, it is extremely crucial to mention here that out of the six convicts who have been granted remission, four are Sri Lankan Nationals, said the plea. The Supreme Court\u2019s November 11 order \u201cbeing violative of principles of natural justice and wreaked with glaring and manifest errors apparent on the face of the record, keeping in view the international ramifications it entails, there is also substantial cause in the matter warranting its review and an open hearing, wherein, Union of India could be afforded an opportunity to place the correct and germane facts before this Court to assist it to arrive at a just and correct decision in the matter i.e. why the six convicts were not entitled for any relief by this Court,\u201d the Centre further stated.<\/p>\n
The top court in its order noted that Nalini has been behind bars for over three decades and her conduct has also been satisfactory. She has a PG diploma in Computer Application and Ravichandran’s conduct has also been found to be satisfactory he has undertaken various studies during his incarceration including a PG diploma in Arts. Gandhi was assassinated on the night of May 21, 1991, at Sriperumbudur in Tamil Nadu by a woman suicide bomber, identified as Dhanu, at a poll rally.<\/p>\n
The decision of the Supreme Court does alarm the nation and the BJP, because after all, it is the prime minister of India and this verdict could apply to any prime minister in the future, releasing an assassin of a prime minister due to good conduct!\u00a0 India by and large usually gives the death sentence to terrorists such as Ajmal Kasab even after they plead for mercy.<\/p>\n
The Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi<\/h3>\n
The assassination of Rajiv Gandhi<\/a>, former Prime Minister of India, occurred as a result of a suicide bombing in Sriperumbudur in Tamil Nadu, India on 21 May 1991. At least 14 others, in addition to Rajiv Gandhi, were killed. It was carried out by Kalaivani Rajaratnam (popularly known by her assumed names Thenmozhi Rajaratnam and Dhanu), a member of the Sri Lankan Tamil separatist organization Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) along with Dr. Jagjit Singh Chohan of the National Council of Khalistan (NCK) and Gurjant Singh Budhsinghwala of the Khalistan Liberation Force. At the time, India had just ended its involvement, through the Indian Peace Keeping Force, in the Sri Lankan Civil War. Subsequent accusations of conspiracy have been addressed by two commissions of inquiry and have brought down at least one national government. (Inputs from Wikipedia)<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t <\/div><\/div>\n\t\t